Quantcast

Can Cain explain and survive?

Armstrong Williams | 11/10/2011, 11:16 a.m.
Who is Herman Cain?

photo

At Thanksgiving, embracing the winds of change and increasing our faith

Contemporary U.S. culture suffers a special kind of irony, one that could hardly have been predicted. For years, conservative Washington has been considered a bastion of racism, and in those same years, conservatives have contended that it is about facts and merit. No more, no less.

The United States is in its third year under the tenure of its first Black president-an event that many thought would never happen in the first place, never mind the possibility of the challenging nominee being another Black man from the "racist party."

What you hear from some conservative commentators, that this is a "high-tech lynching" of an "uppity Black conservative" and the media is punishing him for being "Black while conservative," is ludicrous and boring. Ludicrous not only because you can't for a minute tell me Politico wouldn't have run the story if it had been Romney, Perry, Paul or Bachmann, but because the use of language with such negative connotations and history is imprudent and unnecessary.

The backlash Herman Cain is receiving has little to do with the fact that he's a Republican, nothing to do with his skin color and everything to do with the fact that news today in the "Age of Twitter" reports first and asks questions later. It must be radical, sensational and, most importantly, it must go viral. And where it's not ludicrous, it's boring, because we already know the media is biased against Republicans. So what? We've been saying that for years.

But why bring about the question of race? Don't Republicans hate it when they oppose Democrats "of color" on policy or make a personal accusation, and the first response of that Democrat "of color" and his or her defenders is to say, "You must be a racist." Don't Republicans hate that?

Well, why was the first response from some conservatives that this must have to do with Cain's race? That makes them guilty of the same race-baiting we accuse Democrats of. Let's stick to the issue.

The real issue is, why are Cain's responses so inconsistent and incoherent? Most Republican voters find it hard to believe he didn't remember details about a significant accusation only 12 years old. Put yourself in his shoes, Bruce. You're successful. You have ambitions. You have a career and a reputation. And four women are making accusations that could end it all today.

One of the accusers Sharon Bialek, who is represented by ambulance chasing attorney Gloria Allred, had her share of the spotlight yesterday to tell her side of the story. It shouldn't surprise many about how salacious and detailed her allegations were. "Instead of going into the offices, he suddenly reached over and put his hand on my leg, up my skirt, and towards my genitals," Bialek said. "He also grabbed my head and brought it toward his crotch. I was very, very surprised and very shocked."

Anyone can bring allegations against a public or private official with an attorney that specializes in vicious allegations. I would caution the public to make sure that these accusers are thoroughly vetted before giving them any benefit of the doubt.