Quantcast

Intolerance and the left

Armstrong Williams | 4/4/2013, 5:32 p.m.
At Thanksgiving, embracing the winds of change and increasing our faith

The cases before the Supreme Court recently have once again placed a focus on the idea of tolerance in our country. Tolerance is a funny thing in the political sphere and is increasingly used by the left to denigrate anyone who opposes them. If we were to open up the New Progressive's Dictionary and Thesaurus, you would probably see the following definitions:

Knuckledragger: A Christian Conservative.

Racist: Anyone who did not vote for Obama or even disagrees with an Obama administration policy.

Bigot: Everyone in the GOP; also every Christian.

Pro-life Conservative: Code word for justifiable misogyny

Second Amendment Proponents: Slack-jawed yokels who hate children.

Intolerant: Anyone who believes something we do not.

That's not to say conservatives are not guilty of similar arguments, but I've noticed recently that as the right is trying to reassess and address its problems, the left's talking heads cynically dismiss the debate and reassert hateful stereotypes. When discussing the politics of hate, we must be careful that we are not simply using an ad hominem attacks--attacking the character rather than the substance.

Of course, political operatives know very well that they are making ad hominem attacks. The problem comes when the character assassinations are internalized by society to the detriment of honest debate.

More than anything, I think that technology has led to the demise of intellectual discourse. Go to the comments setion of any online article or blogpost, and you'll see it devolve into a flame war of insults and shouting. Hiding behind a computer means we don't actually interact with those that disagree with us. Instead they are the "other," an anonymous avatar representing everything we detest about those who disagree with us. Each combatant claims to hold the moral high ground of tolerance while admonishing the character of all who oppose their views.

To truly proclaim oneself as the epitome of tolerance, one must be tolerant of all, refusing to judge any for their beliefs. That means the truly tolerant can never make a stand against hate, bigotry, abuse, etc., because, by their own belief system, they cannot openly judge the actions of others as right or wrong. Rather, they must accept all.

Obviously, few people are capable of truly pursuing this ... "virtue." And just as rare is the person who applies the tenant of tolerance objectively, rather than haphazardly using it as a subjective judgment. As noted, I tend to find that those most loudly decrying the virtue of tolerance tend to be practicing intolerance themselves, many times more so than those they rebuke. This is true on both sides of the political spectrum.

Many conservatives today who happens to be Black are insulted constantly as a race traitor, being called "Uncle Tom" and much, much worse. By labeling Black conservatives with such slurs, dissenters are attempting to invalidate any opinion they hold rather than addressing their arguments on their merits. Is that "tolerance"? However, I must admit that rarely do I personally experience these ad hominem attacks. The reason is that our TV and radio shows and columns are heavily concentrated in these communities and many have gotten to respect and understand my reasoning. The attacks are more about the lack of understanding by many minorities that conservatives are principled in what they believe and are entitled to another school of thought. Freedom should never be restrained and always expressed. This is how any community grows authentically and makes substantial progress.