Quantcast

Harlem church screens films to bridge gap between gentrification and education

Courtenay Brown | 7/29/2013, 10:58 a.m.
It was the good ol’ times all over again Monday night at AME Zion Church on the Hill.
TEN founder Joe Rogers, Jr. helped facilitate a discussion among community members after the screening of two films about gentrification. Courtenay Brown photo

It was the good ol’ times all over again Monday night at AME Zion Church on the Hill. More than 30 people gathered to watch and discuss two locally produced documentaries that helped the audience reminisce about an older Harlem that was once a stomping ground for small Black-owned businesses. The films then offered a sharp contrast to these memories with images of a more modern, gentrified Harlem.

The screenings were a summer edition of a larger initiative founded in March of 2011, “The Harlem/Washington Heights Education Film Screening and Community Discussion Series,” which works in conjunction with Total Equity Now (TEN), Community League of the Heights (CLOTH) and AME Zion Church on the Hill. The session on gentrification is the 20th event the three organizations have hosted together.

The Rev. DeForest Raphael of AME Church on the Hill is happy to see the church become a resource to the community, as it continues to host monthly events with TEN and CLOTH. “The church gains a sense of connectedness,” Raphael said. “With Columbia University’s expansion, the community is changing and the church is seen as an entity that supports the community.”

Joe Rogers Jr., founder of TEN, an organization that seeks to empower members of the Harlem community through education, said that he wanted to screen the films and allow attendees themselves to bridge the gap between two topics, gentrification and education, which are often discussed separately.

“We don’t just watch a film and then talk at people for an hour and a half or so,” Rogers said. “We show the film as a launching point for a democratic, small-group community center dialogue.”

To encourage this dialogue, Rogers pulled the attendees, who varied in age and race, into different groups after watching “El Barrio Tours: Gentrification in East Harlem” by Andrew Padilla and “Changing Face of Harlem” by Shawn Batey. The groups were asked to produce questions for the two filmmakers about the effects of gentrification and education, as well as allow an opportunity to build communities across the various backgrounds and neighborhoods from which they came.

Yvonne Stennett, executive director of CLOTH, a 61-year-old organization that is committed to bettering the lives of southern Washington Heights residents, said that it was especially important for different people from different communities to come together to discuss these issues.

“We have to address issues head-on that are controversial because if you don’t, what comes out of it is more pain than good,” Stennet said. “It’s important to have these types of platforms so that people can talk and try to figure out how we cope with it and make the best out of the situation that as individuals we may not have control over.”

Discussion lasted more than two hours after the films were screened as several individuals posed questions to the filmmakers and one another about the positive effects gentrification could have on education, such as the diversification of schools, and the negative effects, like the loss of culture and sense of place. One attendee, Bernadette Anderson, who works with the International Youth Leadership Institute, described the discussion as “healthy” and “informative.”

“I think the forum created an environment for us to become activists and have community, and find solutions to the issues in our communities,” said Anderson, who has an interest in improving education. Meanwhile, Stennett closed the forum by emphasizing the importance of doing just that.

“This was only the tip of the iceberg,” Stennett said. “I’m glad questions were asked and I don’t think all of them were answered. I think that’s good because now people have the opportunity to go home and think about it a little bit more.”