Quantcast

Revitalizing the demand for reparations

Amadi Ajamu | 10/17/2013, 2:41 p.m.
The Caribbean Community’s (CARICOM) Amadi Ajamu

The Caribbean Community’s (CARICOM) re-igniting of the reparations movement has raised the stakes in the push for decisive governmental direct action. The 15-member regional bloc of nations established its Reparations Commission in July 2013, laying out the strategy for reparations for African enslavement and colonization, and genocide of the indigenous populations of the Caribbean against the governments of Western Europe.

The December 12th Movement International Secretariat attended the first CARICOM Regional Reparations Conference, held in St. Vincent and the Grenadines in September, and has begun to revitalize the reparations movement in the U.S. Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves addressed its Harlem report back during his New York City visit to the U.N. General Assembly. Moving forward, the International Secretariat sponsored a Pan-African Reparations forum in Brooklyn last week featuring David Comissiong Esq. of the Barbados Reparations Committee, Cikiah Thomas of the Global African Congress of Canada and Roger Wareham Esq. of the December 12th Movement U.S. delegation.

The forum opened with the screening of a documentary of the historic United Nations World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) in September 2001. The film, “The Durban 400,” focused on the WCAR Pan-African front steeled by the Africa Group; the Caribbean Group; the United States-based Durban 400 delegation, led by the December 12th Movement and the National Black United Front; and many allied nations and non-governmental organizations. On Sept. 8, 2011, the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action declared the transatlantic slave trade and slavery (TAST) as crimes against humanity and prescribed compensation for the descendants of its victims.

The intense internal struggles at the WCAR included the breakaway of the Caribbean group of nations from the Group of Latin American and Caribbean nations [GRULAC] after the Latin Americans refused to declare the TAST as crimes against humanity; Israel’s attempt to make itself the WCAR target, claiming antisemitism; and the United States’ dramatic dissent and walkout. Then, three days after the WCAR ended, two planes crashed into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, and the international agenda suddenly changed to Bush’s “war on terror.”

Comissiong explained, “[But] the seeds had been planted, and we are seeing once again, in the year 2013, that this issue is coming to the fore with a vengeance. We decided at that meeting in St. Vincent that we have to go forward with a three-pronged strategy to secure reparations. We have to pursue legal remedies, in particular the World Court. We have to simultaneously pursue diplomatic strategies, that is, we have to mobilize other governments around the world and utilize international diplomatic fora like the United Nations. Thirdly, we have to deploy political strategies—take it before the national parliaments and mobilize our national populations.”

Thomas, chair of the Global African Congress in Canada, stated, “The framework of a successful reparations movement came out of Durban. Many of us who went to Geneva [U.N. Human Rights Commission-Group of African Descendants] knew very little about each other. I remember Roger Wareham handing out something about the basis of reparations. There were four or five principles, and I can assure you that all of the reparations activists and those who were not activists became active overnight.