A `Tale of Two Cities’ worthy of the Mayor’s scorn
David R. Jones | 11/5/2015, 1:39 p.m.
Bill de Blasio’s rise to the second most powerful elective office in the country was due in large part to the solid support he received from the city’s black and Latino population, who believed he would do something about inequities in law enforcement, housing and education.
The latest polls notwithstanding, the mayor deserves credit for taking on income inequality in the city. It’s an agenda that we know is not popular with everyone. But mayors should not make decisions based on what’s popular. Rather, decisions should be based on what’s in the city’s best interests.
That principle applied to the mayor’s removal of controversial `Stop and Frisk’ tactics used by the NYPD to harass countless numbers of blacks and Latinos, the overwhelming majority of whom were young men who had not committed any crimes. Our streets did not become unsafe, as some predicted they would after the mayor’s action. In fact, this week the NYPD reported that crime levels are at historic lows.
The mayor has also taken steps to preserve aging housing stock at NYCHA, the city’s most important source of public housing for half a million low-income New Yorkers. Over the next three years the city will spend $300 million on capital improvements. He has also returned $100 million annually to the authority’s maintenance budget by eliminating payments it made to the city for police services and property taxes. Shoring up public housing and putting NYCHA on a path to financial solvency are in the best interests of the city.
Equalizing educational opportunities
And it is most certainly in the city’s best interest to provide students in every community – including those in high-poverty neighborhoods – with equal access to a quality education. But is that achievable? It seems as though we’ve accepted the chronic racial disparities we see in academic proficiency, graduation rates, drop-out rates and college readiness as stubborn, socio-economic problems well beyond the scope of government, our educational institutions and political will.
But allowing inequality to perpetuate in the system is not an option either, particularly for a mayor who has staked his administration on creating a more equitable city. And there is no clearer ‘Tale of Two Cities’ than the one told by the current admissions policy for the city’s Specialized High Schools. If the mayor is serious about equalizing educational opportunities, he can start with changing the way the city’s most selective high schools admit students.
My organization recently analyzed newly available data about students who apply to New York City’s eight Specialized High Schools (SHS). Currently, admission into these elite schools is based exclusively on the results of a single test, known as the Specialized High Schools Admissions Test (SHSAT), which education experts agree is arbitrary, inaccurate, and an unfair measure of merit. This is the only such policy in the country. The New York City Department of Education (NYDOE) has admitted that it has never studied the SHSAT to determine whether it predicts success in the Specialized High. More importantly, it’s a policy that is having a devastating impact on black and Latino students.
There is something wrong when the public school system is 75 percent black and Latino, yet these students represent fewer than 10 percent of the students in the city’s eight Specialized High Schools. A recent survey of Stuyvesant High School students found that just three percent of all students identify themselves as black or Latino. In 2012, Stuyvesant offered admission to only nine black students out of an incoming class of nearly 1,000 students.
Our Proposal: A Top 3 Percent Plan
To address this imbalance, we propose that the NYCDOE replace the SHSAT with existing state English Language Arts (ELA) and Math exams, which are taken and prepared for by all students, unlike the SHSAT. Offers of admission would go to students whose state exam scores fall within the top three percent of their middle school, assuming those students also meet citywide standards of high performance. Simulating our proposal with real data shows that only nine percent of students receiving offers would change under our plan. And these new students would be the highest achievers from our lowest income neighborhoods, leading to double the numbers of blacks and Latinos receiving offers to Specialized High Schools.
The mayor has the authority to immediately change admissions policy for five of the Specialized High Schools and join community advocates in calling on state lawmakers to help change admissions policy at the three oldest schools -- Stuyvesant, Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech. It is inconceivable that there are more than two hundred middle schools in the city’s poorest communities receiving no offers to the city’s most prestigious high schools. It’s time to change that.
David R. Jones, Esq., is President and CEO of the Community Service Society of New York (CSS), the leading voice on behalf of low-income New Yorkers for 170 years. The views expressed in this column are solely those of the writer. The Urban Agenda is available on CSS’s website: www.cssny.org.