Carson’s indelible legacy won’t be defaced by petty politics
Armstrong Williams | 8/30/2018, midnight
The recent AP story claiming that the people of Baltimore, Dr. Ben Carson’s long time home, have forsaken their local hero is wedge politics at its most cynical. Carson’s decades-long legacy of life-saving acts and groundbreaking medical brilliance will shine on despite recent attempts to besmirch his character. It is almost as if the people forgot how Carson’s Carson Scholar’s program has brought hope and continued educational opportunity to hundreds of inner city children across our nation. They forgot the literally thousands of lives Carson saved with his own hands as one of the world’s most accomplished and renowned neurosurgeons. Carson is without doubt a hero’s hero—one of the very few living people who deserve such a legacy.
Where do these political elites get off claiming otherwise? Carson has long extolled the virtues of self-reliance, moral striving and good character as the gateway out of poverty and into prosperity. Unlike many others who give mere lip service to plight of the poor and marginalized, Carson and his wife Candy have put their money where their mouth are. Carson sees education – not government handouts—as the key to social, economic and moral uplift for the masses of Black people. It should come as no surprise that a man of demonstrated faith and compassion would take his job as the secretary of HUD seriously.
Despite the media’s attempt to portray Carson as a clueless buffoon who is in way over his head, since taking office at HUD, Carson methodically and deliberately studied the problem of housing the poor. He has looked at the long-term data and realized that generations of families have been essentially stuck in poverty, relying upon government services for subsistence rather than making choices and striving to achieve the American dream. Carson is heartfelt in his empathy for the plight of the poor. He aims to solve the problem of protracted poverty by offering a pathway toward prosperity.
The people speaking out against Carson know this, and many of them exemplify the ethic of striving for achievement in their own lives. Whether it is former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke, who having worked closely with Carson while in office and afterward should know better; or the Principal of the Archbishop Borders School in Baltimore who removed the portrait of Carson that hung in the school’s hallway — these people all have a political ax to grind.
Nevertheless, their hollow protestations reveal more about their own political ambivalence than they say about Carson’s diminished image. They are unhappy about having been left out of the political gravy train, and are clamoring behind the scenes for a seat at the table. On the one hand, they despise people like Carson and Omarosa for having a seat at the table in the Trump administration, and on the other hand, they are envious because they feel left out.
The reality of the situation is that Carson is making great strides toward leveraging the agency’s almost $50 billion budget and sprawling, labyrinthine array of programs toward the singular objective of lifting people up from poverty. By proposing to raise rents in subsidized housing projects, Carson is signaling that residents should begin to get on the road to self-actualization and responsibility. He is not merely trying to streamline the agency, however. He is proposing a completely new perspective about the role of government as a lever for economic development in impoverished communities.