A broken-down USPS could decide America’s fate

Stephon Johnson | 7/30/2020, midnight
On Tuesday, Senator Bernie Sanders introduced a bill to manufacture and distribute personal protective equipment to all Americans.
mailbox/US Postal Serice Photo by Abstrakt Xxcellence Studios from Pexels

On Tuesday, Senator Bernie Sanders introduced a bill to manufacture and distribute personal protective equipment to all Americans. The proposal, which included sign-offs from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Kamala Harris, would use the United States Postal Service to mail three free, reusable masks to every person in the country including those who are homeless, incarcerated, in assisted living facilities, or in college dorms.

With the current state of the USPS, however, that plan may be difficult to pull off. America’s postal service is in disrepair with some pundits and academics believing it to be by design.

In the spring, President Donald Trump blocked emergency funding for the USPS which employs almost 600,000 people. According to the Washington Post, Trump also allegedly threatened to veto the CARES (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security) Act if the $2.2 trillion pact contained funding for USPS. During a news conference in April, Trump called the postal service “a joke” and said that it needed to quadruple its prices for services in order to close its debts.

Those looking to save the postal service have been blocked at every turn. Legislators had agreed to bail out the USPS to the tune of a $13 billion grant that they wouldn’t have to repay. That was blocked by U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Postmaster General Luis DeJoy echoed the Trump administration’s doctrine and said the postal service, as it is, won’t survive.

“The Postal Service is in a financially unsustainable position, stemming from substantial declines in mail volume, and a broken business model,” stated DeJoy. “We are currently unable to balance our costs with available funding sources to fulfill both our universal service mission and other legal obligations. Because of this, the Postal Service has experienced over a decade of financial losses, with no end in sight, and we face an impending liquidity crisis.”

While attempts to contact officials at the American Postal Workers’ Union were unsuccessful, union leaders have been loud about their disapproval of the Trump administration’s actions.

“The new Postmaster General, Louis DeJoy, a multi-millionaire businessman who knows little of the inner-workings of the public Postal Service, has been in office just a little over one month,” read a recent statement. “Yet without consultation or input from any of the postal unions, postal customers or mailing community he has launched a series of actions that will undermine the postal service and are an insult to every postal worker, every postal craft and every postal customer.”

Some of those actions include reducing hours, closing on Saturday, delaying mail, slowing service, removing mail processing equipment, reducing work hours and eliminating overtime. APWU officials said they would continue to fight for relief funding in the CARES Act.

“The American Postal Workers Union vehemently opposes any actions that slow down and undermine mail processing, delivery and retail services and thus drives business and revenue away from the Postal Service,” read part of their statement.

You could go back to former Congressman Paul Ryan for a recent foray into conservatives and the post office. In 2014, Ryan proposed a budget that postal workers believed was a thinly veiled attempt to make the agency a target for privatization via cutting worker benefits and available services. It called for workers to pay more for health care and cited the continued loss of money and lack of funding liabilities to further defund the postal service and cut services. The budget would also hike up pension contributions from all government employees while simultaneously cutting the workforce.

In the budget, Ryan wrote that the USPS is “unable to meet its financial obligations and is in desperate need of structural reforms.”

But the desire to cut back on the postal service didn’t start with Ryan. Kimberley Johnson, a professor of Social and Cultural Analysis at New York University, stated via email that this was in the works for almost 40 years.

“…but it’s not just Ryan,” said Johnson, “…this defunding/privatization has been a project of the Republican Party and right wing since Reagan.”

It was in the 1980s that President Ronald Reagan failed in his attempt to change the USPS’s status as a public agency and sell it off for money. Reagan’s excuse, along with many conservatives, was that the government had gotten too big and was too inefficient and they needed to cut some services. (Ironically, in 2011 the postal service unveiled a “Ronald Reagan Forever” stamp adorned with the former president’s image “celebrating his centennial year.”)

However, Johnson said there is another source of motivation for leaving the postal service in disrepair.

“It’s also linked to an attempt to reduce government employment,” continued Johnson. “The side effect of that is reduce [sic] Black employment and therefore economic mobility. Joe Lowndes has a great book on this…”

Johnson is referring to the book “Producers, Parasites, Patriots: Race and the New Right-Wing Politics of Precarity” that Lowndes, a political science professor at the University of Oregon, co-wrote with Daniel Martinez HoSang, an associate professor of Ethnicity, Race & Migration and American Studies at Yale University. In the book, the writers argue that Black government employment is seen as parasitical to conservatives.

But some pundits have theories as to why Republicans are extra motivated in 2020. The combination of Trump trailing Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden in virtually every poll and the coronavirus pandemic have given the president and Republicans an opening to rail not only against the service in general but against the concept of mail-in voting: something that members of the armed forces use.

In May, Trump falsely claimed that mail-in voting would lead to voter fraud. This claim was made after California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he would try to expand mail-in voting for the election during the pandemic. Newsom’s announcement led the Republican National Committee to file a lawsuit over his efforts stating that mail-in voting “violates citizens’ right to vote” and could be a hotbed of voter fraud.

Trump also presented another reason for opposing mail-in voting.

“MAIL-IN VOTING WILL LEAD TO MASSIVE FRAUD AND ABUSE,” Trump tweeted on May 20. “IT WILL ALSO LEAD TO THE END OF OUR GREAT REPUBLICAN PARTY. WE CAN NEVER LET THIS TRAGEDY BEFALL OUR NATION.”

Johnson cited another book by author Naomi Klein to explain the current Republican game.

“…it’s a little too coincidental, but COVID has offered an opportunity,” said Johnson. “Think shock doctrine. Yes it will cause mayhem but it depends on how line managers respond or not to pressure from the top.”