The atrocities that law enforcement officers witness on a daily basis can have a profound impact on their mental health. Officers are witnesses to the worst of humanity: disturbing images of women beaten by their husbands, dead children and bodies mitigated beyond recognition. These officers endure trials that no person should ever have to face, yet they continue to leave their homes and families every day, not knowing if they will return home alive or even return as the same person their loved ones once knew. Therefore, we must prioritize and invest in mental health resources for law enforcement to ensure that the individuals responsible for protecting our lives daily are in a stable and healthy mental state.
Tyre Nichols was beaten, battered and murdered by five law enforcement officers who took an oath to protect their community. Their job was to safeguard the citizens, not to take their lives. I have no sympathy for them, and neither should you—they killed a person in cold blood who was going about his daily business. He could have been you.
The question, therefore, is not only whether these officers, and others like them who commit such atrocities, should be held accountable and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law but how we can further prevent such situations in the future.
Take away the uniform and a police officer is no different from a civilian. The actual difference lies in their mental state. Police have witnessed things that no sane person would ever want to experience or voluntarily choose to see. And they must continue to go out daily, knowing they will probably encounter similar situations.
To prevent further indiscriminate violence by police officers, it is crucial that they are equipped not only with physical protection, such as body armor and firearms, but also with the necessary mental state to protect others. It is well-known that individuals who commit acts of violence, such as school shootings or mass killings, are not mentally sound. Unfortunately, the same applies to police officers who commit such heinous acts of violence. With the inordinate power they wield over civilians, we must hold them to a higher standard for their actions but treat their mental state like anyone else’s to ensure they don’t need to be held accountable for anything. This means ensuring they are in the right mind before being deployed in the field.
I am convinced that the officers who brutally attacked Tyre Nichols were mentally ill and unstable. It is incomprehensible that they would beat an innocent man to the brink of death simply because he did not comply with their commands. I have encountered many police officers who have faced situations of a fleeing suspect, and none of them felt compelled to act in the way that these officers in Memphis did. This is not because they are necessarily better people, but because they are mentally stronger, or at least haven’t experienced an event or a group of events that has made them mentally unequipped to wear a badge.
The actions of unstable police officers have put America at a crossroads. Will we create an environment where law enforcement is hindered and exposed to increased danger, both from a legal and physical standpoint, or will we provide them with the resources to continually uphold the standards of professionalism expected of those who serve and protect?
This incident should be viewed as a lesson, not a reckoning. While five officers committed unspeakable acts, there are millions of officers out there who would never do such a thing. For those officers, it is crucial that they are provided with the appropriate tools to discharge their duties to the best of their ability. This includes ensuring that they have access to mental health professionals so they can cope with and process even the most disturbing events they may witness, rather than allowing it to fester and cause them to harm—or even kill—innocent people.
Law enforcement officers are people like you and me. They have human emotions and experiences that they carry with them throughout their lives. No situation they encounter is something taken lightly; it exacts a heavy toll and adds a burden that has an impact on how they discharge their duties.
However, they also carry immense power in their role, which must be exercised with caution to protect the rights and liberties of those they serve.
What these Memphis officers have done is done, and now we must move forward to prevent these tragic situations from occurring in the future. Investing in mental health resources for officers is how we start. Law enforcement is disrespected by being defunded and not supported, which is why so many have retired, and others refuse to consider the case altogether, leading to nationwide police shortages. Officers need support, too, and a part of that is having healthy relationships with the communities they protect and serve. The job is demanding and taxing, and only some people are willing to accept a position where they may not return home to their loved ones. We all benefit when we’re able to trust each other.
Follow on Twitter @arightside.
Support our Racial Equity Journalism
Amsterdam News is renowned for its reporting of the news of the day from a Black perspective for 113 years. Donors who choose to give monthly or annually will receive Amsterdam News’ Weekly E-Edition and acclaimed free weekday newsletter Editorially Black delivered by email.
“The atrocities that law enforcement officers witness on a daily basis have a profound impact on their mental health.” Is the writer trained and qualified to make this statement, which is the first sentence in the article? What is the, “profound impact on their mental health? Ordinary people see and witness what the police see every day. They are the ones who call the police after witnessing the “atrocities” to which the writer makes reference. Is this an excuse for bad cops?
“Tyre Nichols was beaten, battered and murdered by five law enforcement officers…” “…they killed a person in cold blood…” Reportedly, police officers have been charged with allegedly committing crimes, including murder 2, against Tyre Nichols. “Killing in cold blood” generally implies a plan for the killing which does not appear to be the case in Tyre Nichols’ death, based on the news reports.
“Take away the uniform and a police officer is no different from a civilian.” Take away the uniform of a “bad” cop and one will probably find a “bad” civilian.
“I am convinced that the officers who brutally attacked Tyre Nichols were mentally ill and unstable.” If one accepted that statement as a factual finding by a court of law, the officers charged would be found “not guilty” because of the “mental illness” that the writer attributes to the officers.
“While five officers committed unspeakable acts, there are millions of officers out there who would never do such a thing.” “If it is not broken, it will be if you fix it.” ReB The challenge, here and elsewhere, seems to be finding ways to get rid of bad cops, not fixing something that’s not broken or attributing bad behavior by cops to mental illness caused by what police observe on the job. If there is science to support the writer’s assertions regarding mental health, the writer ought to cite it.
“I have encountered many police officers who have faced situations of a fleeing suspect, and none of them felt compelled to act in the way that these officers in Memphis did.” Is the writer here contending that Tyre Nichols was a “fleeing suspect” while saying elsewhere in the article, “they killed a person in cold blood who was going about his daily business.”
“The actions of unstable police have put America at a crossroads. Will we create an environment where law enforcement is hindered and exposed to increased danger, both from a legal and physical standpoint, or will we provide them with the resources to continually uphold the standards of professionalism expected of those who serve and protect.” It is ironic that the writer’s “question” ends with the punctuation for a “statement”. Thus, it appears that the writer wants Tyre Nichols’ death to be used as justification to give more resources for police. That is so antithetical to what is needed at this dignified hour.
“Law enforcement officers are people like you and me. They have human emotions and experiences that they carry with them throughout their lives. No situation they encounter is something taken lightly; it exacts a heavy toll and adds a burden that has an impact on how they discharge their duties.” These words of the writer sound like excuses, to me, for police who do not properly perform their duties.
“What these Memphis officers have done is done, and now we must move forward to prevent these tragic situations from occurring in the future. Investing in mental health resources for officers is how we start.” These is no evidence that mental illness was the cause for Tyre Nichols’ death. I suspect that there is much more support among the public protesters of Tyre’s death for approaches that would keep bad police applicants from becoming officers and identifying and removing bad cops already wearing badges.
It is strange, to me, that the writer expressed no compassion for Tyre Nichols’ family, friends, or other loved ones.
RussellE Binion (ReB), Morgan State University ’63
Washington DC