NLRB bans controversial captive-audience meetings

Sign up for our FREE acclaimed newsletters!

The news mainstream media just doesn’t cover. Racial justice journalism since 1909.

Sign up

Many union leaders and labor activists believe that your boss shouldn’t be able to force you to attend a meeting where they rant against the concept of unions.

Some employers don’t believe unions are necessary: Howard Schultz, founder and former CEO of the Starbucks coffee chain, and managers of the supermarket chain Trader Joe’s have each claimed that the benefits their companies give their workers are better than what they could get from any union. Some corporate execs even think of unions as evil, born of anti-capitalist beliefs that refuse to reward merit-based work.

Anti-union bosses in particular have made it their business for decades to speak out against union organizing. For the past 75 years, they were allowed to arrange meetings with their employees so that they could talk about why they feel a labor union is not necessary. Now, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal agency that helps employees and employers agree about the best ways of working together, has determined that those kinds of captive-audience meetings are illegal.

The NLRB says that when employees are forced to attend these kinds of meetings with their boss while union election campaigns are going on, they often feel intimidated.

The new NLRB ruling is based on the union organizing that took place at the Amazon JFK8 Fulfillment Center on Staten Island. In 2021, workers there began organizing to create the Amazon Labor Union (ALU), the first labor union ever at Amazon.

In its written decision, the NLRB notes that “employees here were required to attend many captive-audience meetings, during which [Amazon’s] agents made statements opposing union representation generally and the Union specifically. At one point in the campaign, [Amazon managers] held meetings at its JFK8 facility every 45 minutes from 9 a.m. to p.m. [sic] and 7 p.m. to 4 a.m. 6 days a week. Managers personally notified employees that they were scheduled to attend, escorted them to the meetings, and scanned their ID badges to digitally record attendance.”

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a nonprofit, nonpartisan think-tank, found that 89% of employers use captive audience meetings to try to stop the creation of unions among their workers. In fact, employer spending to prevent the formation of unions has reached $400 million a year for anti-union consultants.

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) International President April Verrett told the Amsterdam News, “This NLRB ruling is an important step to protect working people trying to join unions. Captive audience meetings are one of the oldest tricks in the book for employers who want to stop workers from standing up for themselves. 

“This ruling reassures those workers that they are supported by law when they fight back against a rigged system. In recent years, the NLRB has seen a significant increase in union election petitions and unfair labor practices filed. We can expect these numbers to increase as more people boldly demand an economy that works for everyone.”

When employees do not have a choice and feel obligated to be present at these captive-audience meetings, it may enhance an employer’s free speech rights, but it inhibits employees “from acting freely in exercising their rights,” the NLRB announced in a press release.

“Ensuring that workers can make a truly free choice about whether they want union representation is one of the fundamental goals of the National Labor Relations Act,” said Chairwoman Lauren McFerran in the Nov. 13 press release. “Captive audience meetings — which give employers near-unfettered freedom to force their message about unionization on workers under threat of discipline or discharge — undermine this important goal. Today’s decision better protects workers’ freedom to make their own choices in exercising their rights under the Act, while ensuring that employers can convey their views about unionization in a noncoercive manner.”