Last week, Fox News first called the recall election in favor of Scott Walker while NBC continued to ticker-tape blast that it was too close to call. I checked the Internet for the results of the election on the New York Times and other websites and I noticed there was a significant lag between them calling the election for Walker and Fox News.

It is quite intriguing in retrospect how the media shifted the significance of the recall from the original issue of reducing public employees’ bargaining rights to the issue of jobs. While jobs are the critical issue to the American economy today, out-of-control government compensation of its employees must be reined in. It is certain that the mainstream media will downplay the significance of Walker’s victory on the public service unions, the power of the Democratic Party and the influence on the pending November presidential election.

The original issue of public unions’ collective bargaining rights appears to have been downgraded when it became apparent that Walker would win by a landslide. Instead, the mainstream media decided to spin coverage of Walker’s victory as a result of conservative special interest money that clouded the progressive message. According to Media Matters, a progressive media watchdog group, the conservatives are the ones who are the special interests because Walker raised more money than his opponent.

However, what the mainstream media fails to realize is that the public unions are the real special interests here, not the American people. Unions may complain that conservatives are the special interests, but unions have spent tons of money in order to intimidate public officials to alert them to their cause.

The reason the progressive message is “clouded” is because the people clearly do not want the government siding with the unions.

There has been virtually no coverage of the nationwide rejection of public unions across the country in elections held in key U.S. territories. Lost in the fray of the Wisconsin recall were the results of several California ballot initiatives where voters approved pension cuts to city workers. It is not just Wisconsin voters who believe that public employees are overcompensated–voters across America feel the same way, even in California.

It is obvious that there are inherent conflicts of interest between politicians who are supposed to manage public employees and public service unions who negotiate on behalf of these employees. Without resolving this conflict of interest, it would be virtually impossible for elected politicians to control spiraling wages and benefits to public employees. These out-of-control employee costs, along with entitlement costs, are creating huge deficits in government budgets. Walker’s success in the recall put up a firewall against out-of-control employee compensation. Now we need the politicians to deal as courageously with entitlement reform.

What the people of Wisconsin have told us is that we should not exploit the union’s message. It is clear that the Wisconsin people are not anti-union, but their issue is public service and politicians working sweetheart deals with each other. If the public were to take a poll on whether unions should have collective bargaining rights, most people would agree they should be entitled. People see this as a workers rights’ issue because the majority of us are workers. When politicians and public employees’ unions start trading favors that hurt all taxpayers, it’s a different story. The public finds it repulsive and feels that people should stand up against this issue everywhere. People should not be required to pay dues or join a union.

How is it that the president of ASME can organize 50,000 TSA employees to squeeze the government successfully through the same political maneuvering? The battle is between the self-serving public employees union and the taxpayers, with the politicians in the middle. Taxpayers are paying the politicians to advocate on their behalf for the best value in public service. The unions are using their money to repurchase the politicians, and taxpayers are footing the bill. The unions are manipulating the politicians with political money in return for more generous concessions and thus they can’t be objective for the taxpayers funding the politicians’ salaries.

Are we not against special interests’ influence on government? If the government is in support of unions, which are special interests, it is obviously not taking the interests of the people into account. I thought the days of political machines and Tammany Hall stopped in the 19th and 20th centuries.

However, the people of Wisconsin have spoken. Walker did what most Republicans do not do: fight back. While the unions were screaming, shouting, destroying state property and refusing to work in the interest of protesting working conditions, Walker was working for the interests of the general Wisconsin public.

Now, Walker’s recall victory can once again reiterate to the left, the unions and the mainstream media what they did not seem to learn in the 2010 election–that their fear tactics and influence will not be tolerated. Special interests will not hold the state financially hostage while they contribute nothing in return.

Armstrong Williams content can be found on He is also the author of the new book “Reawakening Virtues.” Come join the discussion live 4-5 p.m., 6-8 p.m. ET at or tune into S.C. WGCV 4-5 p.m., Sirius/XM Power 128, 7-8 p.m. and 4-5 a.m. ET, 6-7 p.m. D.C. a.m. 730 WTNT, 7-8 p.m. WGNU a.m. 920 St. Louis. Become a fan on Facebook and follow him on Twitter.